<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Building In San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/2010/07/time-building-in-san-francisco-with-boatpix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/2010/07/time-building-in-san-francisco-with-boatpix/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/2010/07/time-building-in-san-francisco-with-boatpix/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/?p=1624#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave! The audio is fairly simplistic--just a microphone placed inside the cuff of my headset. I&#039;m a bit surprised that it worked as well as it did. 

The camera doesn&#039;t do a great job of reflecting the altitudes in any of the video I&#039;ve captured so far (from this flight in San Francisco, or from several flights I did with your CFI in San Diego). The camera lens--in this case a wide-angle on a fixed mount--distorts the view, and I was testing different mounting angles. In this case, we descended from 100-200 AGL down to 20-40 AGL for the photos, and flew so that we were pacing the boats for a few seconds while shooting photos. I also have the recording unit for the video system stowed under the seat--at these altitudes, no additional cockpit distractions are needed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave! The audio is fairly simplistic&#8211;just a microphone placed inside the cuff of my headset. I&#8217;m a bit surprised that it worked as well as it did. </p>
<p>The camera doesn&#8217;t do a great job of reflecting the altitudes in any of the video I&#8217;ve captured so far (from this flight in San Francisco, or from several flights I did with your CFI in San Diego). The camera lens&#8211;in this case a wide-angle on a fixed mount&#8211;distorts the view, and I was testing different mounting angles. In this case, we descended from 100-200 AGL down to 20-40 AGL for the photos, and flew so that we were pacing the boats for a few seconds while shooting photos. I also have the recording unit for the video system stowed under the seat&#8211;at these altitudes, no additional cockpit distractions are needed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helinomad</title>
		<link>http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/2010/07/time-building-in-san-francisco-with-boatpix/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>helinomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wikirfm.cyclicandcollective.net/?p=1624#comment-745</guid>
		<description>The audio setup for this is absolutely great, I want a rig like that for myself!  What are the specs?  The video camera, however--well, helicopters have always been a challenging internal photo environment; but what we really needed was a swivel mount of some kind so the video showed the boat being photographed--that would come closer to giving the full impact of the flights.   

One thing I do wonder about is that the apparent camera angle (both of them) appears to have been unusually high--that is, we&#039;re looking DOWN not sideways, at the shoreline and wakes, suggesting that the photo pass was at perhaps 100&#039;.  Not the usual; essentially all of these photo passes are (normally) at between 8&#039;-30&#039; over the water.  (Scary?  Well, Chris doesn&#039;t mention that the helicopters are all Mariners with fully-inflated floats).   (from a BoatPix.com pilot)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The audio setup for this is absolutely great, I want a rig like that for myself!  What are the specs?  The video camera, however&#8211;well, helicopters have always been a challenging internal photo environment; but what we really needed was a swivel mount of some kind so the video showed the boat being photographed&#8211;that would come closer to giving the full impact of the flights.   </p>
<p>One thing I do wonder about is that the apparent camera angle (both of them) appears to have been unusually high&#8211;that is, we&#8217;re looking DOWN not sideways, at the shoreline and wakes, suggesting that the photo pass was at perhaps 100&#8242;.  Not the usual; essentially all of these photo passes are (normally) at between 8&#8242;-30&#8242; over the water.  (Scary?  Well, Chris doesn&#8217;t mention that the helicopters are all Mariners with fully-inflated floats).   (from a BoatPix.com pilot)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

